Citation:
Singh BK, Lal H, Ranjan JK and Singh B.
2016. Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris
L.): advances in genetic improvement. In: National Symposium on Vegetable
Legumes for Soil and Human Health (Singh B, Singh M, Rai AB, Singh PM, Prasad
RN, Mishra GP, Singh BK, Ranjan JK, Devi J, Seth T, Nagendran K., Chaukhande P,
Kumar R, Gautam KK, Gujjar RS and Kumar YB Eds). ICAR-IIVR, Varanasi, 12-14
February 2016, pp 125-136.
E-mail: bksinghkushinagar@yahoo.co.in
Common bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris L.), an important legume, is a rich source of protein, vitamins,
minerals and fibre. The main categories of common beans, on the basis of uses, are
dry beans (seeds harvested at complete maturity), snap beans (tender pods with
reduced fibre harvested before the seed development phase) and shell beans (seeds
harvested at physiological maturity) and. Snap bean is also known as French
bean, garden bean, green bean, edible podded bean, string bean, fresh bean or vegetable
bean. As the name implies, snap beans break easily
when the pod is bent, giving off a distinct audible snap sound. The pods of snap beans (green, yellow and purple in colour) are harvested when they are
rapidly growing, fleshy, tender (not tough and stringy), bright in colour, and
the seeds are small and underdeveloped (8 to 10 days after flowering). After
that period, excessive seed development reduces quality and the pod becomes fibrous,
pithy and tough, and loses its bright colour. Snap bean seeds may also be used in dry static like the dry bean types. In
that case pinto, kidney, pink, small red, etc. terms are used. In India, the
dry bean type varieties are known as rajmash/rajmah, and snap bean named as
rajmah phali in Hindi. Common beans display a wide range of growth habits from
bush determinate to pole indeterminate types. Bush types are the most widely
grown and are a relatively short duration crop; but on the other hand, in
smallholder agriculture or in kitchen garden where land is scarce,
labour-intensive high-yielding climbing beans getting popularity now-a-days. Dry
bean is the largest pulse crop in the world with 23.60 mt of annual production
grown on 29.29 mha area; and the top ten producing countries are Mayanmar (3.90
mt), India (3.63 mt), Brazil (2.79 mt), China (1.46 mt), USA (1.45 mt), Tanzania
(1.20 mt), Mexico (1.08 mt), Kenya (0.61 mt), Ethiopia (0.46 mt) and Rawanda
(0.43 mt). Moreover, snap beans’ global annual production and area is about 20.74
mt and 1.54 mha, respectively with maximum production in China (16.20 mt)
followed by Indonesia (0.87 mt), India (0.62 mt), Turkey (0.61 mt), Thailand
(0.31 mt), Egypt (0.25 mt), Spain (0.17 mt), Italy (0.14 mt), Morocco (0.13 mt)
and Bangladesh (0.09 mt) [FAOSTAT 2012]. In
India, it is grown on an area of about 1 lakh ha mainly in the states of
Maharashtra, Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, North-East
hills, Nilgiri (Tamil Nadu), hills of central India, Palni hills (Kerala)
Chickmagalur (Karnataka) and Darjeeling hills (West Bengal). The tender pods of
snap bean are good source of ascorbic acid (vitamin
C), phylloquinone (vitamin K), β-carotene (vitamin A), riboflavin
(vitamin B2), niacin (vitamin B3), Mn, K, Ca, P, Fe and omega-3 fatty acid. It
is a legume crop, do fix some nitrogen but the N fixing bacteria are not active
as with other legumes; therefore there is need to fertilize the field with
nitrogenous fertilizer to harness the yield potential.
References
Acosta-Gallegos JA, Kelly JD and Gepts P. 2007.
Pre-breeding and genetic diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Crop Science 47 (Supplement 3): S44–S59.
Ali MA. 1950. Genetics of resistance to the common
bean mosaic virus in the bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris L.). Phytopathology 40: 69–79.
Andrews
SA. 2013. Snapping green beans.
http://humanelivingnet.net/2013/12/17/snapping-green-beans (accessed on
22.09.2014).
Arumuganathan
K and Earle ED.1991. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant
Molecular Biology Reporters 9 (3): 208–218.
Beebe
S, Gonzalez AV and Rengifo J. 2000. Research on trace minerals in the common
bean. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 21: 387–391.
Bellucci
E, Bitocchi E, Rau D, Rodriguez M, Biagetti E, Giardini A, Attene G, Nanni L
and Papa R. 2014. Genomics of origin, domestication and
evolution of Phaseolus vulgaris. In:
Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources- Volume 1 (Tuberosa R, Graner A and Frison E eds.). Springer:
Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 483–507.
Bennett MD and Leitch
IJ. 2010. Plant DNA C-values Database (Release 5.0, Dec. 2010).
Chacon SMI, Pickersgill B and Debouck DG. 2005.
Domestication patterns in common bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris L.) and the origin of the Mesoamerican and Andean cultivated
races. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 432–444.
Debouck
DG, Toro O, Paredes OM, Johnson WC and Gepts P. 1993. Genetic diversity and
ecological distribution of Phaseolus
vulgaris in north-western South America. Economic Botany 47: 408–423.
Delgado-Salinas
A, Bibler R and Lavin M. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): A recent diversification in an ancient
landscape. Systematic Botany 31: 779–791.
Drijfhout E, Silbernagel MJD and Burke W. 1978.
Differentiation of strains of bean common mosaic virus. Netherlands Journal of
Plant Pathology 84: 13–26.
Drijfhout E. 1978. Inheritance of temperature-dependent
string formation in common bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris L.). Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 26: 99–105.
FAO
2010. The Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for
Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy, pp. 251–252.
FAOSTAT
2012. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor
(accessed on 28 February 2014).
Federici CT, Ehdaie B and
Wanes JAG. 1990. Domesticated and wild tepary bean: field performance with and
without drought-stress. Agronomy Journal 82: 896–900.
Freytag
GF and Debouck DG. 2002. Taxonomy, Distribution, and Ecology of the Genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae)
in North America, Mexico and Central America. Botanical Research Institute of
Texas, Ft. Worth, Texas, USA.
Genchev
D and Kiryakov I. 2002. Inheritance of resistance to white mold disease (Sclerotinia
sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary) in A 195 (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 8:
181–187.
Gepts
P and Bliss FA. 1985. F1 hybrid weakness in the common bean: differential
geographic origin suggests two gene pools in cultivated bean germplasm. Journal
of Heredity 76: 447–450.
Gepts P, Kmiecik K, Pereira P and Bliss FA. 1988.
Dissemination pathways of common bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris, Fabaceae) deduced from phaseolin electrophoretic variability I.
The Americas Economic Botany 42: 73–85.
Gepts
P, Osborn TC, Rashka K and Bliss FA. 1986. Phaseolin-protein variability in
wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): Evidence for multiple centers of
domestication. Economic Botany 40: 451–468.
Gepts
P. 1998. Origin and evolution of common bean: Past events and recent trends.
HortScience 33: 1124–1130.
Islam
FMA, Basford KE, Jara C, Redden RL and Beebe S. 2002. Seed compositional and
disease resistance differences among gene pools in cultivated common bean.
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49: 285–293.
Kami
J, Velásquez VB, Debouck DG and Gepts P. 1995. Identification of presumed
ancestral DNA sequences of phaseolin in Phaseolus
vulgaris. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92:
1101–1104.
Kelly
JD and Vallejo VA. 2004. A comprehensive review of the major genes conditioning
resistance to anthracnose in common bean. HortScience 39: 1196–1207.
Kelly JD. 2004. Advances in common bean improvement: some
case histories with broader applications. Acta Horticulturae 637: 99–122.
Koenig
R, Singh SP and Gepts P. 1990. Novel phaseolin types in wild and cultivated
common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris,
Fabaceae). Economic Botany 44: 50–60.
Kolkman
JM and Kelly JD. 2003. QTL conferring resistance and avoidance to white mold in
common bean. Crop Science 43: 539–548.
Kwapata
K, Nguyen T and Sticklen M. 2012. Genetic transformation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with the Gus
color marker, the Bar herbicide resistance, and the barley (Hordeum vulgare) HVA1 drought tolerance
genes. International Journal of Agronomy Vol. 2012: 1–8.
Leakey
CLA. 1988. Genotypic and phenotypic markers in common bean. In: Genetic
Resources of Phaseolus Beans (Gepts P
ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, pp. 245–327.
Méndez-Vigo
B, Rodríguez-Suárez C, Pañeda A, Ferreira JJ and Giraldez R. 2005. Molecular
markers and allelic relationships of anthracnose resistance gene cluster B4 in
common bean. Euphytica 141: 237–245.
Miklas
PN, Kelly JD, Beebe SE and Blair MW. 2006. Common bean breeding for resistance
against biotic and abiotic stresses: from classical to MAS breeding. Euphytica
147: 106–131.
Myers
JR and Baggett JR. 1999. Improvement of snap bean. In: Common Bean Improvement
in the Twenty-first Century (Singh SP ed.). Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht,
The Netherlands, pp. 289–329.
Paredes
M and Gepts P. 1995. Extensive introgression of Middle American germplasm into
Chilean common bean cultivars. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 42: 29–41.
Prakken
R. 1934. Inheritance of colors and pod characters in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Genetica 16: 177–294.
Ram
HH. 2005. Vegetable breeding: principle and practices. 2nd Revision,
Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, India, pp 256–273.
Schmit
V, Jardin P, Baudoin JP and Debouck DG. 1993. Use of chloroplast DNA
polymorphisms or the phylogenetic study of seven Phaseolus taxa including P.
vulgaris and P. coccineus.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87: 506–516.
Sicard D, Michalakis Y, Dron M
and Neema C. 1997. Genetic diversity and pathogenic variation of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in the
three centers of diversity of its host, Phaseolus
vulgaris. Phytopathology 87: 807–813.
Silbernagel
MJ. 1986. Snap bean breeding. In: Breeding Vegetable Crops (Bassett MJ Ed.).
AVI Publication Co., Westport, Connecticut, USA, pp. 243–282.
Singh
BK, Deka BC and Ramakrishna Y. 2014. Genetic variability, heritability and
interrelationships in pole-type French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 84(3): 587–592.
Singh BK, Pathak KA, Ramakrishna Y, Verma VK and Deka BC.
2011. Purple-podded French bean with high antioxidant content. ICAR News: A
Science and Technology Newsletter 17 (3): 9.
Singh BK, Ramakrishna Y, Verma VK and Singh SB.
2013. Vegetable cultivation in Mizoram: status, issues and sustainable
approaches. Indian Journal of Hill Farming 26 (1): 1–7.
Singh BK, Sharma SR and Singh B. 2009. Combining
ability for superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase enzymes in cabbage
head (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L). Scientia Horticulturae
122 (2): 195–199.
Singh BK, Sharma SR and Singh B. 2010. Heterosis
for superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase enzymes in the heads of
cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L). Journal of Genetics
89 (2): 217–221.
Singh BK. 2014. VRFBB-91: A French bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris) germplasm for earliness. Vegetable Newsletter 1 (1): 5.
Singh
SP, Gepts P and Debouck DG. 1991a. Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Economic Botany 45: 379–396.
Singh SP, Gutierrez JA, Molina A, Urrea C and Gepts P.
1991b. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean. II. Marker-based analysis
of morphological and agronomic traits. Crop Science. 31: 23–29.
Singh SP, Nodari R and Gepts P. 1991c. Genetic diversity
in cultivated common bean. I. Allozymes. Crop Science 31: 19–23.
Singh
SP. 2001. Broadening genetic base of common bean cultivars: A review. Crop
Science 41: 1659–1675.
Skroch
PW and Nienhuis J. 1995. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of RAPD
variation among snap bean genotypes (Phaseolus
vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 1078–1085.
Sofkova
S, Poryazov I and Kiryakov I. 2010. Breeding green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for complex disease resistance. Genetics and
Breeding 38 (3): 77–88.
Yu K, Chun S and Zhang BL. 2012. Development and
application of molecular markers to breed common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for resistance to common bacterial blight
(CBB)–current status and future directions. In: Applied Photosynthesis (Najafpour
M ed.). Shanghai, China, pp 365-388.
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/30614.pdf.
No comments:
Post a Comment